Persepsi Risiko Keselamatan Berkendara Berdasarkan Paradigma Psikometri Pada Pengguna Kendaraan Roda Dua
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to provide an overview of risk perception of safety and health in the two-wheeler users in Esa Unggul University using psychometric paradigm. The study was conducted on 150 respondents in March – May 2016 using cross - sectional design, the primary data in the form of questionnaires, and supporting data by interviewing informants. The parameters used are Likert scale numbers 1 - 4. The average value of each dimension is calculated as numbers 1 (low), 2-3 (moderate), 4 (good). The results showed that the perception of respondents have been quite good, but still needed to improve. Dimensions voluntary acceptance of perceived high, it means that the workers willing to accept any risks involved in the workplace. In order to create the required behavior of safety cultured, safety related management commitment is strong, safety applicative training and participation of all workers to always safety promote.Keywords: Risk perception, Psychometric paradigm.Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran persepsi risiko keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja pada pengguna kendaraan roda dua di Universitas Esa Unggul menggunakan paradigma psikometri. Penelitian dilakukan terhadap 150 responden pada bulan Maret – Mei 2016 menggunakan desain cross-sectional, data primer berupa kuesioner, dan data pendukung berupa wawancara informan. Parameter yang digunakan adalah skala Likert angka 1 – 4. Nilai rata-rata masing-masing dimensi dihitung dimana angka 1 (rendah), 2 – 3 (sedang), 4 (baik). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi responden telah cukup baik namun masih perlu adanya peningkatan. Dimensi penerimaan secara sukarela dipersepsikan tinggi, berarti bahwa pekerja mau menerima segala risiko yang ada dipekerjaannya. Agar tercipta perilaku berbudaya K3 maka diperlukan komitmen manajemen terkait K3 yang kuat, pelatihan K3 yang aplikatif dan partisipasi dari seluruh untuk selalu memajukan K3.
Kata Kunci : Persepsi Risiko, Paradigma Psikometri.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
B. Mullin; R.Jackson; J. Langley; & R.Norton. Increasing age and experience: are both protective ag ainst motorcycle injury? A case-control study. Injury Prevention, 6(1), 32-35. 2000.
B. Sexton; C. Baughan; M. Elliott & G. Maycock. The accident risk of motorcyclists (TRL607. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRL Limited). 2004.
Barry Watson; Deborah Tunnicliff; Katy White; Cynthia Shonfeld & Darren Wishart. Psychological and Socoal Factors Influencing Motorcycle Rider Intention and Behaviour. Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety (CARRS-Q). Queensland University of Technology. 2007.
Baruch Fischoff; Paul Solvic; Sarah Lichtenstein. How Safe is Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences, pp 127-152. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 1978.
Clinton M. Jenkin. Risk Perception and Terrorism: Applying the Psychometric Paradigm. Homeland Security Affairs, VOL. II, NO. 2. 2006.
D.Fergusson; Swain-Campbell; N. & Horwood, J. Risky driving behaviour in young people: prevalence, personal characteristics and traffic accidents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27(3), 337-342. 2003.
Departeman Perhubungan Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Direktorat Keselamatan Transportasi Darat Satuan Kerja Peningkatan Keselamatan Transportasi Darat. Penyusunan rencana umum keselamatan transportasi darat. Jakarta: Departemen Perhubungan Darat. 2006.
Dominic Cooper. Psychology, Risk & Safety: Understanding How Personality & Perception can Influence Risk Taking. Proffesional Safety. 2003.
E. S.Fitzgerald; W. A Harrison.; N. J. Pronk, & Fildes, B. 1998. An investigation of characteristics associated with driving speed. Paper presented at the Road Safety Research, Policing, Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand. 1998.
Garcia-Ferrer, Aranzazu De Juan A, Poncela P. The relationship between road traffic accidents and real ecomonic activity in Spain: Common cycles and health issues. Health Economic;16: 602-26. 2007.
Handayani, Putri. Persepsi Risiko Keselamatan Terhadap Perilaku Keselamatan Berkendara Pada Mahasiswa Pengguna Kendaraan Roda Dua. Jurnal Forum Ilmiah. Volume 13 No. 1. Universitas Esa Unggul. 2016.
Iwan Ariawan. Besar dan Metode Sampel Pada Penelitian Kesehatan. Depok: Jurusan Biostat dan Kependudukan FKM UI. 1998.
J. Jaccard; T. Dodge; H. Blanton. Peer influences on risk behavior: an analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology American Psychological Association; 1 (41): 135–14. 2005
L. Botterill & Mazur N. Risk and Risk Perception: A Literature Review. RIRDC Publication. Australia. 2004.
L. Quine; D. R. Rutter; & L. Arnold. Persuading school-age cyclists to use safety helmets: Effectiveness of an intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6(4), 327-345. 2001.
L. Sjöberg. Risk Perception Is Not What It Seems: The psychometric paradigm revisited. In K. Andersson (Ed.), VALDOR Conference 2003 (pp. 14-29). Stockholm: VALDOR. 2003.
M. Schmidt. Investigating Risk Perception: a Short Introduction. Chapter 3 in: Loss of Agro-Biodiversity in Vavilov Centers, With a Special Focus on the Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). PhD Thesis, Vienna, Austria. 2004.
N.Haworth; R.Smith; I.Brumen; & N.Pronk, Case-control study of motorcycle crashes (CR 174). Canberra: Dept. of Transport and Regional Development, Federal Office of Road Safety. 1997.
NJ. Pender. Health Promotion In Nursing Practice. 4th ed. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall. 2002.
Paul Slovic & Elke U. Weber. Perception of Risk Posed by Extreme Events. Conference of Risk Management strategies in an Uncertain World, Palisades, New York, April 12-13. 2002.
S. Stradling; M. Meadows; & S. Beatty. Characteristics of speeding, violating and thrill-seeking drivers. In T. Rothengatter & R. D. Huguenin (Eds.), Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application (pp. 177-192). Oxford: Elsevier. 2004.
Torbjørn Rundmo; Sigve Oltedal; Bjørg-Elin Moen; Hroar Klempe. Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of cultural theory. Rotunde publikasjoner Rotunde. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Psychology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. 2004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/inohim.v4i2.93
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul
Jl Arjuna Utara No 9. Tol Tomang, Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta. 11510
Email : inohim.ueu@esaunggul.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
View My Stats