Evaluasi Kawasan Tanpa Rokok (KTR) di Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia

Daniel Happy Putra

Abstract


 Abstract

 

Smoking was one of the risk factors of cardiovascular disease in Indonesia. The risk of smoking behavior cause Indonesia to compose a national scale program aimed at suppressing a community smoking behavior, that is non smoking zone. Health faculty of University of Indonesia as one of the state universities in Indonesia already considered the importance of the issuance of rules regarding the restriction of smokers in campus environment. The Indonesian university's non-smoking regulations have begun to be implemented since 2011. The purpose of this research was to analyze the implementation of a non-smoking area in the Faculty of Public Health University of Indonesia, both from the socialization, supervision, and coaching. Research is done with a qualitative approach using the Rapid Assessment Procedure. Based on the research results a non-smoking area concept in the Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia has been conducted in several public areas such as libraries, learning parks and building borders. Although the regulations have been there for a long time there was still remains a breach of the implementation of the program. The offender consists of various students, lecturers, education personnel and hygiene officers. Based on the research results no penalty given to the violator caused the absence of a deterrent effect in the implementation of a non-smoking area program in a campus environment, this is a setback compared to several years when the rule started to take effect. There was a need to strengthened the implementation of no smoking zone in term of socialization supervision, or coaching in Faculty of Public Health Universitas Indonesia to improve the effectiveness of program in the later days.

Keyword: Smoking ,Non Smoking Zone, Program Evaluation, Non-communicable diseases

Abstrak

Merokok merupakan salah satu faktor risiko terjadinya penyakit kardiovaskular di Indonesia. Bahaya dari perilaku merokok ini menyebabkan Indonesia menyusun sebuah program berskala nasional yang ditujukan untuk menekan perilaku merokok di lingkungan masyarakat yaitu kawasan tanpa rokok. Universitas Indonesia sebagai salah satu perguruan tinggi negeri di Indonesia pada fakultas kesehatan sudah mempertimbangkan akan pentingnya penerbitan aturan mengenai pembatasan perokok di lingkungan kampus. Aturan tentang kawasan tanpa rokok di Universitas Indonesia sudah mulai diterapkan sejak tahun 2011. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan kawasan tanpa rokok di lingkungan  Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia baik dari sisi sosialisasi, pengawasan serta pembinaan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif menggunakan desain Rapid Assesment Procedure. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian konsep kawasan tanpa rokok di lingkungan Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia telah dilakukan di beberapa tempat umum seperti perpustakaan, taman belajar dan perbatasan gedung. Walaupun peraturan telah ada sejak lama tetap ada kendala berupa pelanggaran terhadap pelaksanaan program tersebut. Pelanggar aturan terdiri dari berbagai kalangan baik mahasiswa, dosen, tenaga kependidikan maupun petugas kebersihan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tidak ada hukuman yang diberikan kepada pelanggar menyebabkan tidak adanya efek jera dalam pelaksanaan program kawasan tanpa rokok di lingkungan kampus, hal ini merupakan kemunduran dibandingkan dengan beberapa tahun mulai berjalannya aturan tersebut. Perlu diadakan penguatan dalam pelaksanaan program kawasan tanpa rokok baik dari segi sosialisasi, pengawasan ataupun pembinaan di lingkungan Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia untuk meningkatkan efektivitas program di kemudian hari.

Kata Kunci: Merokok, Kawasan Tanpa Rokok, Evaluasi Program, Penyakit tidak menular

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Nururrahmah. Rokok Terhadap Kesehatan dan Pembentukan Karakter Manusia. 2014;01.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS) 2013. Lap Nas 2013. 2013;1–384.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS) 2007. Lap Nas 2007. 2008;1–384.

WHO. WHO | Tobacco. WHO. 2016;

Kementerian Kesehatan. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2013 [Internet]. Permenkes No 40 Tahun 2013 Indonesia; 2013. Available from: http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/3933

Universitas Indonesia. Petunjuk Teknis Kawasan Tanpa Rokok Universitas Indonesia. 1805/SK/R/UI/2011 Indonesia; 2013.

Curtis DB, Floyd JJ, Winsor JL, Kandagasari N. Komunikasi bisnis dan profesional [Internet]. PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2002. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1kVinQAACAAJ

Cumming J, Goldstein H, Hand K. Enhanced use of educational accountability data to monitor educational progress of Australian students with focus on Indigenous students. Educ Assessment, Eval Account. 2020;32(1):29–51.

Dunn WN. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction [Internet]. Prentice Hall; 1994. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xC22AAAAIAAJ

EU Integration Office. the Logical Framework Approach Framework. 2011. 1–78 p.

Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, Mortier E, et al. Communication in healthcare: A narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(11):1257–67.

Hu Y, Hu Y. Health communication research in the digital age : A systematic review Health communication research in the digital age : A systematic review. J Commun Healthc [Internet]. 2017;0(0):1–29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2015.1107308

Heininga VE, Van Roekel E, Wichers M, Oldehinkel AJ. Reward and punishment learning in daily life: A replication study. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):1–18.

Chalfin A, McCrary J. Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. J Econ Lit. 2017;55(1):5–48.

Anderson KP, Ritter GW. Do School Discipline Policies Treat Students Fairly? Evidence From Arkansas. Educ Policy. 2018;1–28.

Rahnuma N. Evolution of quality culture in an HEI: critical insights from university staff in Bangladesh. Educ Assessment, Eval Account. 2020;32(1):53–81.

Qian H, Walker A. Reconciling top-down policy intent with internal accountability: the role of Chinese school principals. Educ Assessment, Eval Account. 2019;31(4):495–517.

Chung OK, Li WHC, Ho KY, Kwong ACS, Lai VWY, Wang MP, et al. A descriptive study of a Smoke-free Teens Programme to promote smoke-free culture in schools and the community in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/inohim.v8i1.201

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Jl Arjuna Utara No 9. Tol Tomang, Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta. 11510

Email : inohim.ueu@esaunggul.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats